HOME

Privatsphäre im Netz: Ein offener Brief an die EU zum Entwurf der neuen ePrivacy-Verordnung

Anfang des Jahres hat die EU-Kommission den offiziellen Entwurf der neuen ePrivacy-Verordnung vorgestellt. In einem offenen Brief wendet sich Gruner + Jahr gemeinsam mit vielen europäischen Verlagen gegen die Initiative. Wir dokumentieren den Brief sowie die Unterschriftenliste im englischen Original.

Hände tippen auf einer Laptop-Tastatur (Symbolfoto)

We support the objective of the Commission’s draft "ePrivacy" regulation, which has the potential to clean up the digital economy, and to restore citizen trust in how their data is used online. Citizens are rightly concerned about the use of their personal data by third party companies of whom they have never heard, and have no idea about the role that they play in their digital lives online. News organisations depend on the trust of our readers, and we support a system of regulation that restores trust, and cleans up the digital environment. But news organisations also use data generated by readers to improve their products and services by offering readers journalism that is relevant to them, and serving display digital advertising that is relevant to readers.

As a result of digital distribution, more digital citizens are accessing high quality news and quality information than ever before. But the increasing trend towards consumers accessing news content via third party gateways such as Google News, Facebook, Yahoo, Apple News, MSN (Microsoft) and Amazon Alexa is changing the way that European citizens consume news [Source], making publishers ever more reliant on a small number of global platforms as a consequence.  Through the current ePrivacy proposals, the Commission proposes that digital citizens must consent to non-strictly necessary tracking on a global basis when they connect to the Internet via a browser interface.  Given that 90 per cent of usage across Europe is concentrated in the hands of just four companies: Google, Apple, Microsoft and Mozilla [Source], this focus on obtaining user permission via the browser interface has the potential to exacerbate the asymmetry of power between individual publishers and these global digital gateways.

The ePrivacy proposals contrast with the implication of the Commission’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – due to come into force in May 2018 - which aims to empower user privacy by forcing sites themselves to make sure that users understand and are empowered to control the gathering of data about their browsing behaviour in context of each site that they visit. By creating a single global permission within the browser interface, the Commission´s ePrivacy proposals will make it more difficult to ensure transparency and meaningful user empowerment in practice, and remove any distinction between publishers who place a high value on the trust of their users, and those who do not.  While the explanatory memorandum accompanying the ePrivacy proposals does not place an outright ban on publishers communicating with readers in order to seek consent for the use of 3rd party cookies, in practice, publishers are concerned that it will be incredibly difficult to persuade readers to change their browser settings to allow 3rd party cookies.  As a consequence, individual news organisations would be unable to provide readers with personalised content and marketing, or serve relevant digital advertising within their environments.

The practice of serving relevant advertising to readers is now an established norm in the advertising industry, and is essential to ensure that publishers can compete with Google and Facebook who already control 20% of total global advertising spend in 2017[Source].  If as a result of these proposals, news publishers were unable to serve relevant advertising to our readers, this would reduce our ability to compete with the capabilities of dominant digital platforms for digital advertising revenues, ultimately undermining our ability to invest in high quality journalism across Europe.

The current ePrivacy proposals will result in the data of European digital citizens being concentrated in the hands of a few global companies, as a result of which, digital citizens will become less protected. It will give those global companies: a tighter grip on the personal data of European digital citizens; further strengthen their dominance in the European digital economy, and; introduce further complexity for individual publishers, despite the European Commission acknowledging these issues are already covered by the regulation that will enter into force in 2018.

By shifting consent to the collection of data from each individual news site that they visit, to providing a global consent via a small number of powerful gateways, the Commission’s proposals threaten to prevent news organisations from delivering basic functionality such as the marketing of products and services, the tailoring of news products to the needs and desires of news consumers, and relevant and acceptable advertising. The impact on news organisations would be to reduce their ability to deliver high quality products and services, and undermine their ability to generate advertising revenues to reinvest in journalism.

Therefore it is essential that in implementing the objectives of the "ePrivacy" proposals, the European Parliament / Council must work with the news industry to ensure that the directive provides flexibility of implementation to encourage a direct relationship between each internet user and the trusted news organisations that they visit, not further undermine it.


Athesia Druck

Bernhard Paris, Manager Medien

Class Editori

Davide Fumagalli, CDO

DER SPIEGEL

Thomas Hass, Managing Director

Jesper Doub, Managing Director SPIEGEL Online

Die Zeit

Dr. Rainer Esser, Managing Director Zeitverlag Gerd Bucerius GmbH & Co. KG

Christian Röpke, Managing Director ZEIT ONLINE GmbH

Enrique Tarragona, Managing Director ZEIT ONLINE GmbH

DMG Media

Kevin Beatty, CEO

Editoriale Bresciana

Laura Airaghi, Marketing Director

EPC

Angela Mills Wade, Executive Director

Financial Times

John Ridding, CEO

Frankfurter Allgemeine

Thomas Lindner, CEO

Gazzetta di Parma

Mario De Stefano, CDO

GEDI Gruppo Editoriale

Monica Mondardini, CEO

Groupe Bayard / La Croix

Georges Sanerot, Président du Directoire

Groupe Figaro CCM Benchmark

Marc Feuillée, Directeur général

Groupe L´Equipe

Cyril Linette, Directeur général

Groupe Le Monde

Louis Dreyfus, Président du Directoire

Groupe Les Echos / Le Parisien

Francis Morel, CEO

Gruner + Jahr

Julia Jäkel, CEO

Arne Wolter, CDO

Grupa Wirtualna Polska

Michal Branski, Board Member and VP Product Strategy

Gruppo 24 Ore

Franco Moscetti, CEO

Guardian Media Group

David Pemsel, CEO

IMPRESA

Francisco Pinto Balsemão, Chairman

L'Humanité

Patrick Le Hyaric, President du directoire et directeur

Libération

François Dieulesaint, Gérant

MEDIAHUIS

Gert Ysebaert, CEO

NRC

Rien van Beemen, CEO

Persgroup

Christian Van Thillo, CEO

PRISA

José Luis Sainz, CEO

Sanoma

Susan Duinhoven, President & CEO

Schibsted Media Group

Rolv Erik Ryssdal, CEO

SETA

Gianluigi Campari, CEO

Süddeutsche Zeitung

Stefan Hilscher, Managing Director Süddeutscher Verlag GmbH

Johannes Vogel, Managing Director Süddeutsche Zeitung Digitale Medien GmbH

Telegraph Media Group

Murdoch MacLennan, CEO

Unidad Editorial

Javier Cabrerizo, Managing Director

kann man sich gegen eine maßnahme vom jobcenter wehren?
hallo. ich bin quasi arbeitsunfähig seit meinem 18ten lebensjahr. ich wiege 200 kg und habe eine betreuung weil ich sonst gar nichts schaffen würde. sie bringt mich zu terminen und begleitet mich zu arzt besuchen. das einzige was ich noch alleine kann ist einkaufen und das auch nur weil es nunmal lebensnotwendig ist ,jedoch bin ich danach total erschöpft und fertig.ich kann keine 200 meter mehr laufen.und mal ganz abgesehen von meiner körperlich verfassung leide ich seit meiner kindheit an starken depressionen,borderline,panikattacken,einer traumatischen belastungsstörung und angstzuständen. ich bin demnach körperlich sowie auch psychisch ziemlich fertig. gestern war ich beim amtsarzt zur begutachtung sowie auch einmal vor 2 jahren. und die ärztin sagt mir ernsthaft,das es zumindest köperlich nicht ausreichen würde das ich weiterhin krank geschrieben werden kann und sagte,das eine maßnahme sicherlich gut sein kann.und das obwohl ich bereits sagte,das ich körperlich unfähig bin irgendwas alleine zu schaffen und ,meine betreuerin mich überallhin begleiten muss.(ich habe kein auto)ich bin vollkommen entsesetzt und habe nun angst das sie mich in eine maßnahme stecvken welche ich einfach nicht schaffe und sie mir dann das minum an geld nehmen welches ich bekomme und ich dann verhungernd und auf der starße leben muss,eben weil es ein ding der unmöglichkeit für mich darstellt.kann man sich da irgendwie wehren?sie sagt sie findet ich sei zu jung um berentet zu werden (28).ich habe gerade wirklich angst.kann man einen menschen zwingen etwas für ihn unmögliches zu tun?ich hab das gefühl die wollen irgendeine quote erfüllen und solange man die arme bewegen kann,ist man arbeitsfähig...hilfe :(